I recently wrote a post on Sarah Palin and her shameless tweet on the proposed banning of sweets amongst Pennsylvania School Districts. If you are not yet familiar with the Palin cookie controversy spreading across social media, nutrition and food allergy blogs you can read my previous post
here. For those of you who already read my post, here is an update:
Apparently, Palin wasn't listening when the overwhelming responses to her controversial tweet came flooding in asking that she not bring the cookies and requesting that she further educate herself in the issues that initiated the treat ban, Palin disregarded them all.
A second comment was made from Palin the following day stating, "2 PA school speech; I’ll intro kids 2 beauty of laissez-faire via serving them cookies amidst school cookie ban debate;Nanny state run amok!” It seems as though Palin feels she has some sort of political obligation to prove the PA State Board of Education wrong. We are talking about cookies and in a public education environment. I don't believe this is a situation in which the government is trying to regulate the decisions we as parents make in regards to our kids nutrition, but rather a school system that is merely trying to look after the health and safety of their students. Needless to say, Palin did attend the event with 200 sugar cookies in tow. She was also later quoted by
ABC News as saying, "I had to shake it up a bit...I brought dozens and dozens of cookies to these students".
Though many may deem Sarah Palin and her actions as inappropriate, she is not alone in her efforts to support cookies, cakes, and other such items in the classroom. For many of us these confectionery goodies were the sole focus of school celebrations growing up. On a nutritional basis, I have to a agree that an occasional cupcake is more then acceptable. The problem lies with what is considered occasional to one parent may differ from another.
Looking at this from the point of view of a mother who has a child with life-threatening food allergies I would have to strongly disagree with these "special" treats being brought into the classroom. For the nearly 2.2 million school-age children with food allergies, these treats could be deadly. Even a trace of a child's allergen in something they either come in contact with or eat could send them in to anaphylactic shock, a sudden, severe allergic reaction characterized by a sharp drop in blood pressure, urticaria, and
breathing difficulties which may result in death. Simply reading a label on a food item is not adequate due to the
Food Allergen Labeling and Consumer Protection Act (FALCP). This would not only pose too high a risk to the school staff, but also to the allergic child as well. Another problem is home made treats brought in by a parent who may not understand not only the risks of cross-contamination, but also how to prevent it. Lastly, there is a "Sarah Palin" it seems in every school. The ones who think that the rules do not apply to them and their children. I cannot afford to put my trust in someone who I feel likely to avoid proper precautions when bringing in safe treats for my son.

Every child should be entitled to their fare share of cookies and cakes but it is not fair for one child to have to sit out while the others indulge in cupcakes, and candies. A school celebration should be just that. What happened to games? Are these treats just an easy way out? These kids should be able to use these "party days" as a time to participate in special play and/or activities. If food is required, why not sweet fruit? Leave the other stuff for home. Chances are your child won't even miss it.
Obesity is caused mainly by students living a sedentary life style. Parents have also become lazy at parenting and have found the 'ultimate baby sitter' in TV and video games for their kids. Eating sugar cookies is just the icing on the cake.
ReplyDeleteRegarding your suggestion that fresh fruit be served as a treat, many people are allergic to certain fruits such as watermelon, strawberries, and kiwi. They can be just as deadly as tree nut allergies.
ReplyDeleteYou've written in other posts about "sweats" being banned. Sweats are made with fleece. Sweets are made with sugar. You also confuse "fare" and "fair" as well as "do" and "due." I agree with the message you're trying to convey but, right or wrong, some people will dismiss the valid points you make because of misspellings.
Kim is correct in that many people are allergic to certain fruits such as watermelon, strawberries, and kiwi but these allergies are very rare. The eight foods that account for 90% of all food-allergy reactions in the U.S are milk, egg, peanut, tree nuts (for example, walnuts, pecans, almonds, and cashews), fish, shellfish, soy, and wheat. If your child is does have a fruit allergy then I would not support the use of fruit being used as a replacement for other sugary treats.
ReplyDeleteAs for the misspelling of a few words I apologize as I am not and have never claimed to be a "writer". I am hoping people where able to figure out the spelling error considering we where talking about cupcakes and such. If you really thought this post was about sweat pants then, well I really don't know what to say.
I live in PA where they suposedly banned parties in school (except for ours) and the school nurse suggested I bring in several cupcakes for my daughter (allergic to dairy/eggs) and she would keep them in her freezer so my daughter wouldn't be left out when they have classroom birthday parties atleast once a month. I personally wish holiday parties would be banned because my daughter who's only 5 came home with all sorts of goody bags from other kids in her class most of which were chocolate and very dangerous for her to even touch.
ReplyDeleteMy oldest son has multiple food allergies, including peanut. For their classes halloween party this year, I told the teacher that I would bring in his own treats. I'm glad I did.
ReplyDeleteThe other parents apparently couldn't even be bothered enough to try, since they brought in boxes of assorted donuts including some covered in chopped up peanut pieces.
I don't ask that they not bring donuts, or even that they get certain ones (and honestly we've not found safe ones), but they could have chosen to leave the peanut crusted ones out and really improved the chances of having a safe party for EVERYONE!!!